5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United Paperworkers International Union And Its Local 340 v. Specialty Paperboard, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United Paperworkers International Union And Its Local 340 v. Specialty Paperboard, Inc. Anchor | green | “supreme court has set forth limited circumstances under which it might be preferable to borrow a federal limitations period” | 4 |
| 2 | Gluck v. Unisys Corporation | green | “a state court or legislature does not necessarily seek to further or even consider federal laws when it develops its choice of law provisions. a federal choice of law rule would address those concerns.” | 3 |
| 3 | Wang Laboratories, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Paul G. Kagan, Cross-Appellee | green | “in an erisa case, we ordinarily borrow the forum state's statute of limitations ....” | 3 |
| 4 | Hollander v. Capon | green | “the statute of limitations is a procedural issue. if the action is barred by the statute of limitations of the forum court in which the lawsuit is pending, no action may be maintained even if the action is not barred in the state where the cause of action arose.” | 3 |
| 5 | Nickolaou v. Securities & Exchange Commission | green | “a state court or legislature does not necessarily seek to further or even consider federal laws when it develops its choice of law provisions. a federal choice of law rule would address those concerns.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.