Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 156 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Califano v. Yamasaki.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Califano v. Yamasaki Anchor | green | “an exception to the usual rule that litigation is conducted by and on behalf of the individual named parties only.” | 72 |
| 2 | East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. Rodriguez | green | “a class representative must be part of the class and 'possess the same interest and suffer the same injury' as the class members.” | 48 |
| 3 | East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. Rodriguez | green | “a class representative must be part of the class and possess the same interest and suffer the same injury as the class members.” | 18 |
| 4 | East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. Rodriguez | green | “possess the same interest and suffer the same injury” | 18 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.