3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Martinez v. Bloomberg LP.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Martinez v. Bloomberg LP Anchor | green | “ourts must apply the law contractually chosen by the parties to interpret the clause.” | 7 |
| 2 | Martinez v. Bloomberg LP | green | “to ensure that the meaning given to a forum selection clause corresponds with the parties' legitimate expectations, courts must apply the law contractually chosen by the parties to interpret the clause.” | 5 |
| 3 | Cornett v. Carrithers Ex Rel. Estate of Carrithers | green | “he construction of forum selection clauses by federal courts is a matter of federal common law, not state law of the state in which the federal court sits.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.