2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 16 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kip Yurt v. Carolyn Colvin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kip Yurt v. Carolyn Colvin Anchor | green | “as a general rule, . . . the alj's rfc assessment must incorporate all of the claimant's limitations supported by the medical record.” | 9 |
| 2 | Hortansia Lothridge v. Andrew Saul | green | “the alj's findings about the jobs could perform needed to account in a meaningful way for the earlier findings that recognized her difficulties with concentration, completing tasks, and managing stress.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.