4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alstom Caribe, Inc. v. Geo. P. Reintjes Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alstom Caribe, Inc. v. Geo. P. Reintjes Co. Anchor | green | “the core purpose of rule 67 is to relieve a party who holds a contested fund from responsibility for disbursement of that fund among those claiming some entitlement thereto.” | 6 |
| 2 | In Re Grossman's Inc. | green | “e decide cases before us based on our own examination of the issue, not on the views of other jurisdictions.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Biaggi | green | “rule 67 should . . . be used as a procedural device to provide a place of safekeeping for disputed funds.” | 3 |
| 4 | People Express Airlines, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp. | green | “he cases . . . involve tort claims by innocent third parties who suffered purely economic losses at the hands of negligent defendants with whom no direct relationship existed.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.