3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Laird v. Tatum.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Laird v. Tatum Anchor | green | “onstitutional violations may arise from the deterrent, or 'chilling,' effect of governmental regulations that fall short of a direct prohibition against the exercise of first amendment rights.” | 9 |
| 2 | Laird v. Tatum | green | “constitutional violations may arise from the deterrent, or 'chilling,' effect of governmental regulations that fall short of a direct prohibition against the exercise of first amendment rights.” | 3 |
| 3 | Knox v. Service Employees International Union, Local 1000 | green | “aneuvers designed to insulate a decision from review by this court must be viewed with a critical eye.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.