3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Buell Cabinet Company, Inc. v. Sudduth.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Buell Cabinet Company, Inc. v. Sudduth Anchor | green | “questions of intent involve many intangible factors, such as witness credibility, that are best left to the consideration of a fact finder after a full trial.” | 5 |
| 2 | Nesbitt v. United States | green | “questions of intent involve many intangible factors, such as witness credibility, that are best left to the consideration of a fact finder after a full trial.” | 5 |
| 3 | In re Sutton | green | “questions of intent involve many intangible factors, such as witness credibility, that are best left to the consideration of a fact finder after a full trial.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.