4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 15 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sarah Morgan v. Dennis W. Gay.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sarah Morgan v. Dennis W. Gay Anchor | green | “under cafa, the party seeking to remove the case to federal court bears the burden to establish that the amount in controversy is satisfied.” | 5 |
| 2 | Hart v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc. | green | “it is reasonable to understand these as two 'express exceptions' to cafa's normal jurisdictional rule, as the supreme court used that term in breuer.” | 4 |
| 3 | Alfred Digiacomo v. Teamsters Pension Trust Fund of Philadelphia and Vicinity | green | “t is generally presumed that congress acts intentionally and purposely when it includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another.” | 3 |
| 4 | Serrano v. 180 Connect, Inc. | green | “nce federal jurisdiction has been established under , the objecting party bears the burden of proof as to the applicability of any express statutory exception under 1332(d)(4)(a) and (b).” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.