Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 142 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Electric Power Group, LLC v. Alstom S.A..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Electric Power Group, LLC v. Alstom S.A. Anchor | green | “collecting information, analyzing it, and displaying certain results of the collection and analysis” | 39 |
| 2 | Credit Acceptance Corp. v. Westlake Services | green | “mere automation of manual processes using generic computers does not constitute a patentable improvement in computer technology.” | 38 |
| 3 | Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corporation | green | “a claim for a new abstract idea is still an abstract idea.” | 35 |
| 4 | buySafe, Inc. v. Google, Inc. | green | “that a computer receives and sends the information over a network-with no further specification-is not even arguably inventive.” | 30 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.