2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 14 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sara Schmitt v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commis.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sara Schmitt v. Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commis Anchor | green | “despite dissatisfaction with how the alj weighed the evidence, it is not this court's role to reweigh that evidence.” | 9 |
| 2 | McCoy v. Astrue | green | “a claimant's represents the most he can do despite the combined effects of all of h credible limitations and must be based on all credible evidence.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.