4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Frank Franze v. Equitable Assurance.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Frank Franze v. Equitable Assurance Anchor | green | “nquiry notice " 'the term used for knowledge of facts that would lead a reasonable person to begin investigating the possibility that his legal rights had been infringed” | 3 |
| 2 | Cape Ann Investors v. Lepone | green | “reasonably diligent investigation . . . may consume as little as a few days or as much as a few years to get to the bottom of the matter” | 3 |
| 3 | Dodds v. Cigna Securities | green | “duty of inquiry" arises once "circumstances would suggest to an investor of ordinary intelligence the probability that she had been defrauded” | 3 |
| 4 | Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd., and Fujisawa Usa, Inc. v. John K. Kapoor | green | “the facts constituting notice must be sufficien . . . to incite the victim to investigate" and "to enable him to tie up any loose ends and complete the investigation in time to file a timely suit” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.