3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Lanza.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Lanza Anchor | green | “n act de- nounced as a crime by both national and state sovereign- ties is an offense against the peace and dignity of both and may be punished by each” | 4 |
| 2 | MacArthur v. San Juan County | green | “comity is not an inexorable command . . . and a request for recognition of a foreign judgment may be rebuffed on any number of grounds” | 4 |
| 3 | Guinness Plc Guinness America, Incorporated v. Thomas Joseph Ward, (Two Cases) | green | “the effect to be given foreign judgments has therefore histori- cally been determined by more flexible principles of comity” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.