Topic: must do more than say that the statements ... were false an… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #2305

8 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 204 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rombach v. Chang.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Rombach v. Chang Anchor
ca2 · 2004
green “must do more than say that the statements ... were false and misleading; they must demonstrate with specificity why and how that is so.” 73
2 Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano
scotus · 2011
green “that the defendant made a statement that was 'misleading as to a material fact.” 37
3 In Re: Scholastic Corporation Securities Litigation
ca2 · 2001
green “defendants knew facts or had access to non-public information contradicting their public statements” 28
4 Halperin v. Ebanker usa.com, usa.C Inc.
ca2 · 2002
green “by showing, for example, that the cautionary language did not expressly warn of or did not directly relate to the risk that brought about plaintiffs' loss.” 22
5 Tongue v. Sanofi
ca2 · 2016
green “the speaker omits information whose omission makes the statement misleading to a reasonable investor.” 18
6 Podany v. Robertson Stephens, Inc.
nysd · 2004
green “the second circuit has firmly rejected this 'fraud by hindsight' approach.” 10
7 In Re ProShares Trust Sec. Litig.
ca2 · 2013
green “a meaningful pleading obstacle.” 8
8 In Re AstraZeneca Securities Litigation
nysd · 2008
green “the key, of course, is the honest belief of the management in the truth of information issued to the public.” 8

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check