4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Toombs.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Toombs Anchor | green | “n doggett v. united states, the supreme court held that if there is extreme delay, the defendant need not present specific evidence of prejudice and instead may rely on the presumption of prejudice created by the extreme delay” | 3 |
| 2 | State v. Campbell | green | “ounsel was properly granted the right to waive trial in 60 days, over defendant's objection, to ensure effective representation and a fair trial” | 3 |
| 3 | State v. Iniguez | green | “crr 3.3 provides a framework for the disposition of criminal proceedings without establishing any constitutional standards” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Iniguez | green | “crr 3.3 provides a framework for the disposition of criminal proceedings without establishing any constitutional standards” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.