3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Polly Ann Barber v. Kimbrell's, Inc., and Furniture Distributors, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Polly Ann Barber v. Kimbrell's, Inc., and Furniture Distributors, Inc. Anchor | green | “we cannot afford effective appellate review unless we have before us the district court's reasons for finding a particular award appropriate.” | 4 |
| 2 | Grissom v. the Mills Corp. | green | “plaintiff has provided no evidence that the laffey matrix, which pertains to hourly rates of litigation attorneys in washington, d.c., is a reliable indicator of the hourly rates of litigation attorneys in reston, virginia, a suburb of washington, d.c.” | 4 |
| 3 | Robinson v. Equifax Information Services, LLC | green | “he laffey matrix is not binding upon the united states district court for the eastern district of virginia.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.