2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dubinka v. Judges of Superior Court of State of California.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dubinka v. Judges of Superior Court of State of California Anchor | green | “ven if appellants' trials were completed at the time of the district court's decision, the state court proceedings were still pending for younger abstention purposes.” | 6 |
| 2 | Gilbertson v. Albright | green | “there is no doubt that interference with state proceedings is at the core of the comity concern that animates younger.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.