3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wolin v. Smith Barney Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wolin v. Smith Barney Inc. Anchor | green | “raudulent concealment is a species of fraud and so ... must be pleaded with particularity” | 4 |
| 2 | Collins v. Reynard | green | “complaint against a lawyer for profes- sional malpractice may be couched in either contract or tort and that recovery may be sought in the alternative.” | 4 |
| 3 | Christopher Bilek v. Federal Insurance Company | green | “with a viable agency claim on its actual authority theory, complaint moves for- ward at this pleading stage. in reaching this result, we need not and do not reach apparent authority and ratification theories of agency liability.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.