4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Moffitt v. Moffitt.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Moffitt v. Moffitt Anchor | green | “if the trial court determines either that no good will exists or that the good will is unmarketable, then no value for good will should be considered in dividing the marital assets.” | 3 |
| 2 | In Re Marriage of Griswold | green | “if the trial court determines either that no good will exists or that the good will is unmarketable, then no value for good will should be considered in dividing the marital assets.” | 3 |
| 3 | Seizer v. Sessions | green | “if the statute does not apply because the marriage is not defunct, would then be entitled to her community property share of the .” | 3 |
| 4 | In re the Marriage of Griswold | green | “if the trial court determines either that no good will exists or that the good will is unmarketable, then no value for good will should be considered in dividing the marital assets.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.