2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wells v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. Anchor | green | “we recognize the general principle that in michigan separate entities will be respected.” | 7 |
| 2 | Rymal v. Baergen | green | “the law treats a corporation as an entirely separate entity from its shareholders, even where one individual owns all the corporation's stock.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.