4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Kim v. Budget Rent a Car Systems, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kim v. Budget Rent a Car Systems, Inc. Anchor | green | “the existence of duty is a question of law.” | 3 |
| 2 | Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc. | green | “only after the court defines the protected class will the jury then determine whether the injury to the plaintiff was foreseeable.” | 3 |
| 3 | Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc. | green | “only after the court defines the protected class will the jury then determine whether the injury to the plaintiff was foreseeable.” | 3 |
| 4 | Tae Kim v. Budget Rent A Car Systems, Inc. | green | “the existence of duty is a question of law.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.