2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Horne v. Flores.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Horne v. Flores Anchor | green | “because the superintendent clearly has standing to challenge the lower courts' decisions, we need not consider whether the legislators also have standing to do so.” | 8 |
| 2 | Secretary of the Interior v. California | green | “since the state of california clearly does have standing, we need not address the standing of the other respondents, whose position here is identical to the state's.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.