2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. v. UBS Securities, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc. v. UBS Securities, LLC Anchor | green | “he supreme court has been sparing in recognizing state law claims fitting this criterion.” | 7 |
| 2 | Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeigh | green | “he supreme court has been sparing in recognizing state law claims fitting this criterion.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.