3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 11 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Washington v. Smith.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Washington v. Smith Anchor | green | “habeas corpus petition must attack the fact or duration of one's sentence; if it does not, it does not state a proper basis for relief under 2254” | 4 |
| 2 | Robinson v. Sherrod | green | “abeas corpus is not a permissible route for challenging prison conditions.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.