4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 99 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Langford v. Couch.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Langford v. Couch Anchor | green | “he . . . plra amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.” | 50 |
| 2 | Rodosvaldo Pozo v. Gary McCaughtry Randall Gerritson, and David Hautamaki | green | “prisoner who uses all administrative options that the state offers need not also pursue judicial review in state court.” | 33 |
| 3 | Wiley v. Texas | green | “he . . . plra amendment made clear that exhaustion is now mandatory.” | 11 |
| 4 | Jacob Pfaller v. Mark Amonette | green | “ere it is the movant . . . who offers his own statements as the key evidence in support of summary judgment. that is insufficient.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.