6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 98 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jasim Ghanim v. Carolyn W. Colvin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jasim Ghanim v. Carolyn W. Colvin Anchor | green | “engaging in daily activities that are incompatible with the severity of symptoms alleged can support an adverse credibility determination.” | 39 |
| 2 | Adrian Burrell v. Carolyn W. Colvin | green | “inconsistencies between a claimant's testimony and the claimant's reported activities provide a valid reason for an adverse credibility determination.” | 19 |
| 3 | James L. Batson, Sr. v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration | green | “he commissioner's findings are upheld if supported by inferences reasonably drawn from the record, and if evidence exists to support more than one rational interpretation, we must defer to the commissioner's decision.” | 12 |
| 4 | Bray v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | green | “in reaching a credibility determination, an alj may weigh inconsistencies between the claimant's testimony and his or her conduct, daily activities, and work record, among other factors.” | 11 |
| 5 | Kim Brown-Hunter v. Carolyn W. Colvin | green | “as we have long held, we are constrained to review the reasons the alj asserts.” | 9 |
| 6 | Carmickle v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration | green | “e conclude interpretation of the evidence is reasonable and we will not second-guess it.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.