Topic: no federal statute or rule specifically countenances the na… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #2670

3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cynthia Ann Watson v. Unipress, Inc..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Cynthia Ann Watson v. Unipress, Inc. Anchor
ca10 · 1984
green “no federal statute or rule specifically countenances the naming of fictitious parties in a lawsuit” 4
2 Coe v. United States District Court for District of Colorado
ca10 · 1982
green “there is no provision in the federal rules of civil procedure for suit against persons under fictitious names . . . .” 3
3 Seale v. Peacock
ca10 · 2022
green “substituting a named defendant for an unnamed defendant requires amending the complaint” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check