2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 10 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, Edison Electric Institute, Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency, Edison Electric Institute, Chemical Manufacturers Association, Intervenors Anchor | green | “uspension or delayed implementation of a final regulation normally constitutes substantive rulemaking under apa 553.” | 6 |
| 2 | Natural Resources Defense Council v. Abraham | green | “ltering the effective date of a duly promulgated standard could be, in substance, tantamount to an amendment or rescission of the standard.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.