Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 108 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Price.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Price Anchor | green | “the views of a subsequent congress form a hazardous basis for inferring the intent of an earlier one.” | 87 |
| 2 | United States v. Jersey Shore State Bank | green | “demonstrably at odds with the intentions of the drafters,” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. Price | green | “the views of a subsequent legislature form a hazardous basis for inferring the intent of an earlier one.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.