3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Seng-Tiong Ho v. Taflove.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seng-Tiong Ho v. Taflove Anchor | green | “because the plaintiffs fail to show that the expressions of the model have a status of secrecy, their trade secrets misappropriation claim cannot survive summary judgment on the merits.” | 3 |
| 2 | Amp Incorporated v. James Fleischhacker | green | “other courts have warned plaintiffs of the risks they run by failing to identify specific trade secrets and instead producing long lists of general areas of information which contain unidentified trade secrets.” | 3 |
| 3 | Tax Track Systems Corporation v. New Investor World, Incorporated | green | “tax track need not show its information rises to the level of a trade secret, but it must nevertheless establish that it engaged in reasonable steps to keep the information confidential” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.