2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Executive Software North America, Inc. v. United States District Court For The Central District Of California.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Executive Software North America, Inc. v. United States District Court For The Central District Of California Anchor | green | “by codifying preexisting applications of gibbs in subsections (c)(1)-(3), however, it is clear that congress intended the exercise of discretion to be triggered by the court's identification of a factual predicate that corresponds to one of the section 1367(c) categories.” | 6 |
| 2 | Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc. | green | “ection 1367 has indeed altered gibbs' discretionary analysis.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.