4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 89 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Narducci v. Moore.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Narducci v. Moore Anchor | green | “he district court is entitled to find that an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief is forfeited.” | 44 |
| 2 | Harry O'Neal v. James Reilly | green | “e have repeatedly recognized that district courts are entitled to treat an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief as waived.” | 20 |
| 3 | Cromeens, Holloman, Sibert, Incorporated v. Ab Volvo | green | “because volvo raised the applicability of the maine statute in its reply brief, the district court was entitled to find that volvo waived the issue.” | 15 |
| 4 | Windy City Metal Fabricators & Supply, Inc. v. CIT Technology Financing Services, Inc. | green | “we have made it clear that a litigant who fails to press a point by supporting it with pertinent authority ... forfeits the point.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.