3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Macclenny Turpentine Co. v. Baldwin Drainage District.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Macclenny Turpentine Co. v. Baldwin Drainage District Anchor | green | “it is particularly unreasonable for the accused ... to complain of that confusion of which they were the authors.” | 3 |
| 2 | Cowdrick v. Pennsylvania Railroad | green | “it is particularly unreasonable for the accused ... to complain of that confusion of which they were the authors.” | 3 |
| 3 | Cohen v. United States | green | “it is particularly unreasonable for the accused ... to complain of that confusion of which they were the authors.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.