3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 9 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mendola v. Lees Carpets.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mendola v. Lees Carpets Anchor | green | “that the district court has a continuing responsibility to appraise the system in the light of actual conditions and experience and make required changes to assure the maintenance of a unitary system” | 3 |
| 2 | Weibel v. Clark | green | “that the district court has a continuing responsibility to appraise the system in the light of actual conditions and experience and make required changes to assure the maintenance of a unitary system” | 3 |
| 3 | Beckford v. Dade County School Board | green | “that the district court has a continuing responsibility to appraise the system in the light of actual conditions and experience and make required changes to assure the maintenance of a unitary system” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.