4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 85 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from LaRoche v. Denny's, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LaRoche v. Denny's, Inc. Anchor | green | “the law is clear . . . that suspicion, perception, opinion, and belief cannot be used to defeat a motion for summary judgment.” | 66 |
| 2 | Robin Amaro Brungart v. Bellsouth Business Systems | green | “a decision maker cannot have been motivated to retaliate by something unknown to him.” | 13 |
| 3 | Standard v. A.B.E.L. Services, Inc. | green | “both have the same requirements of proof and use the same analytical framework, therefore we shall explicitly address the title vii claim with the understanding that the analysis applies to the 1981 claim as well.” | 3 |
| 4 | Kiesha Cheatham v. DeKalb County, Georgia | green | “whether an action is sufficient to constitute an adverse employment action . . . must be determined on a case-by-case basis.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.