2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Calles v. Scripto-Tokai Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Calles v. Scripto-Tokai Corp. Anchor | green | “justice thomas expounded at length on tort law concerning strict products liability, in a portion of his opinion the majority of the court considered dicta” | 4 |
| 2 | People Ex Rel. Illinois Department of Labor v. General Elec. Co. | green | “ubstantive arguments may not be made in footnotes and responses made thereto are likewise improper” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.