4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 80 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Stephanie McGee v. Department of Child Support Se.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stephanie McGee v. Department of Child Support Se Anchor | green | “the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying mcgee's request to proceed 10 ifp because it appears from the face of the amended complaint that mcgee's action is frivolous 11 or without merit” | 60 |
| 2 | Weilburg v. Shapiro | green | “dismissal of a pro se complaint without leave to 10 amend is proper only if it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could not be 11 cured by amendment.” | 7 |
| 3 | Weilburg v. Shapiro | green | “dismissal of a pro se complaint without leave to 14 amend is proper only if it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could not be 15 cured by amendment.” | 7 |
| 4 | Weilburg v. Shapiro | green | “dismissal of a pro se complaint without leave to 20 amend is proper only if it is absolutely clear that the deficiencies of the complaint could not be 21 cured by amendment.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.