2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 8 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tunstall Ex Rel. Tunstall v. Bergeson.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tunstall Ex Rel. Tunstall v. Bergeson Anchor | green | “where an issue may be resolved on statutory grounds, the court will avoid deciding the issue on constitutional grounds.” | 4 |
| 2 | Tunstall v. Bergeson | green | “where an issue may be resolved on statutory grounds, the court will avoid deciding the issue on constitutional grounds.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.