2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Leonard R. Milstein v. Stephen L. Cooley Robert B. Foltz Countyof Los Angeles, Opinion.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leonard R. Milstein v. Stephen L. Cooley Robert B. Foltz Countyof Los Angeles, Opinion Anchor | green | “acquiring known false statements from a witness for use in a prosecution is ... fabricating evidence that is unprotected by absolute immunity” | 4 |
| 2 | Robichaud v. Ronan | green | “the distinction between the roles may be significantly controlling.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.