2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Collins v. CITRUS NAT. BANK.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Collins v. CITRUS NAT. BANK Anchor | green | “where two or more documents are executed by the same parties, at or near the same time, in the course of the same transaction, and concern the same subject matter, they will be read and construed together.” | 4 |
| 2 | Rebekka Anne Behr v. James Campbell | green | “applies only when litigants try to appeal state court losses in the lower federal courts.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.