2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 7 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Geisinger Clinic v. Di Cuccio.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Geisinger Clinic v. Di Cuccio Anchor | green | “if the promise is entirely optional with the promisor, it is said to be illusory and, therefore, lacking consideration and unenforceable. the promisor has committed him/herself to nothing.” | 4 |
| 2 | Burgettstown-Smith Township Joint Sewage Authority v. Langeloth Townsite Co. | green | “the most significant requirement for recovery is that the enrichment is unjust. we must focus not on the intention of the parties but on the extent the enrichment is unjust.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.