4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 72 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Clinton Hiler v. Michael Astrue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clinton Hiler v. Michael Astrue Anchor | green | “because we remand the case to the alj for the reasons stated, we decline to reach alternative ground for remand.” | 40 |
| 2 | Rounds v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | green | “he alj is responsible for translating and incorporating clinical findings into a succinct rfc.” | 26 |
| 3 | Augustine Ex Rel. Ramirez v. Astrue | green | “court need not address the other claims plaintiff raises, none of which would provide plaintiff with any further relief than granted, and all of which can be addressed on remand.” | 3 |
| 4 | Padilla v. Astrue | green | “s a lay person, an alj is 'simply not qualified to interpret raw medical data in functional terms.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.