2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Kay.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Kay Anchor | green | “by explaining to the court the substance of the proffered evidence . . . and why the court should admit . . . defendants made a sufficient 'informal' offer of proof.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Jake H. Davis, Jr., Barry Gene Spence, Lloyd D. Murray and Honorio Montanez | green | “the phrasing of rule 403 makes it clear that the discretion to exclude does not arise when the balance between the probative worth and the countervailing factors is debatable.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.