2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gupta v. Florida Board of Regents.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gupta v. Florida Board of Regents Anchor | green | “whether an action is sufficient to constitute an adverse employment action for purposes of a retaliation claim must be determined on a case-by-case basis.” | 3 |
| 2 | Tonya J. WIDEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., Defendant-Appellee | green | “we do not doubt that there is some threshold level of substantiality that must be met for unlawful discrimination to be cognizable” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.