2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Midland Fumigant, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Midland Fumigant, Inc. Anchor | green | “a finding of common law fraud does not lend itself to comparison with statutory penalties.” | 3 |
| 2 | Continental Trend Resources, Inc. v. Oxy Usa Inc. | green | “nothing in bmw would appear to prohibit consideration of the cost of those legal proceedings in determining the constitutionally permissible limits on the punitive damages award.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.