Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 483 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Association.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Association Anchor | green | “significant probative evidence tending to support the complaint” | 103 |
| 2 | California Architectural Building Products, Inc. v. Franciscan Ceramics, Inc. | green | “no longer can it be argued that any disagreement about a material issue of fact precludes the use of summary judgment.” | 84 |
| 3 | California Architectural Building Products, Inc. v. Franciscan Ceramics, Inc. | green | “if the factual context makes the nonmoving party's claim implausible, that party must come forward with more persuasive evidence than would otherwise be necessary to show that there is a genuine issue for trial.” | 71 |
| 4 | Taye Addisu Mokhtar Al-Saeed Ghassan Abu Hemdeh v. Fred Meyer, Inc., a Delaware Corporation | green | “a scintilla of evidence or evidence that is merely colorable or not significantly probative does not present a genuine issue of material fact.” | 62 |
| 5 | T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Association | green | “the judge must assume the truth of the evidence set forth by the nonmoving party with respect to that fact.” | 37 |
| 6 | Sue De La Cruz v. James Tormey | green | “the issue is not whether a plaintiffs success on the merits is likely but rather whether the claimant is entitled to proceed beyond the threshold in attempting to establish his claims.” | 34 |
| 7 | Richards v. Neilsen Freight Lines | green | “the absence of a material and triable issue of fact,” | 30 |
| 8 | California Architectural Building Products, Inc. v. Franciscan Ceramics, Inc. | green | “if the factual context makes the non-moving party's claim implausible, that party must come forward with more persuasive evidence than would otherwise be necessary to show that there is a genuine issue for trial.” | 24 |
| 9 | Taye Addisu Mokhtar Al-Saeed Ghassan Abu Hemdeh v. Fred Meyer, Inc., a Delaware Corporation | green | “there must be enough doubt for a 'reasonable trier of fact' to find for plaintiffs in order to defeat the summary judgment motion.” | 21 |
| 10 | Lewis Eisenberg v. Insurance Company of North America, Cigna Corporation | green | “reasonable minds could differ as to the import of the evidence.” | 17 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.