2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from David Harbin v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | David Harbin v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company Anchor | green | “it is well established that the quantum of evidence re- quired to establish liability in an fela case is much less than in an ordinary negligence action.” | 3 |
| 2 | Robert E. Taylor v. Illinois Central Railroad Company | green | “proof of a safer alternative is not necessarily proof of negligence” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.