Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 126 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Autumn H..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Autumn H. Anchor | green | “promotes the well-being of the child to such a degree as to outweigh the well-being the child would gain in a permanent home with new, adoptive parents.” | 66 |
| 2 | Orange County Social Services Agency v. Doris F. | green | “the seriousness of the problem which led to the dependency, and the reason for any continuation of that problem” | 39 |
| 3 | San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Sara D. | green | “the parent must show he or she occupies a parental role in the child's life, resulting in a significant, positive, emotional attachment between child and parent. further, to establish the section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(b)(i) exception the parent must show the child would suf…” | 8 |
| 4 | In Re Zachary G. | green | “the prima facie requirement is not met unless the facts alleged, if supported by evidence given credit at the hearing, would sustain a favorable decision on the petition.” | 7 |
| 5 | San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Tomas L. | green | “at a section 366.26 hearing, the court must terminate parental rights and free the child for adoption if it determines by clear and convincing evidence the child is adoptable within a reasonable time, and the parents have not shown that termination of parental rights would be de…” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.