2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Licci Ex Rel. Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, SAL.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Licci Ex Rel. Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, SAL Anchor | green | “nature and quality, and not the amount of new york contacts must be considered by the court.” | 3 |
| 2 | Jazini v. Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. | green | “a prima facie case requires non-conclusory fact-specific allegations or evidence showing that activity that constitutes the basis of jurisdiction has taken place.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.