2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mylan Laboratories, Incorporated v. Akzo, N.V..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mylan Laboratories, Incorporated v. Akzo, N.V. Anchor | green | “thus, the district court correctly looked both to mylan's and to akzo's proffered proof” | 3 |
| 2 | Ottenheimer Publishers, Inc. v. Playmore, Inc. | green | “it is nonetheless necessary first to identify a specific maryland statutory provision authorizing jurisdiction.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.