5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 65 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Williams v. Rodriguez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams v. Rodriguez Anchor | green | “as a general matter, when all federal claims have been dismissed prior to trial, the federal court should relinquish jurisdiction over the remaining pendant state claims” | 21 |
| 2 | Wright v. Associated Insurance Companies Incorporated | green | “the general rule is that, when all federal claims are dismissed before trial, the district court should relinquish jurisdiction over pendant state-law claims rather than resolving them on the merits” | 19 |
| 3 | United States v. Bowlin | green | “the district court disposed of the federal claims on summary judgment, and so 'substantial judicial resources' have not yet been committed to the case” | 14 |
| 4 | Davis v. Cook County | green | “the district court disposed of the federal claims on summary judgment, and so 'substantial judicial resources' have not yet been committed to the case” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.