2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 6 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sharpston v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sharpston v. State Anchor | green | “not once was sharpston asked whether he actually committed the crime.” | 3 |
| 2 | Henderson v. State | green | “although the state presented evidence tending to show that ms. henderson had the means to pay, the trial court failed to make explicit findings of willfulness as required by the caselaw.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.