7 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 64 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Moses.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Moses Anchor | green | “party may not rely on mere speculation or conjecture as to the true nature of the facts to overcome a motion for summary judgment.” | 17 |
| 2 | Hancock v. Cnty. of Rensselaer | green | “in determining whether there is a genuine dispute as to a material fact, we must resolve all ambiguities and draw all inferences against the moving party.” | 11 |
| 3 | Flores v. United States | green | “while we are required to resolve all ambiguities and draw all permissible factual inferences in favor of the non-moving party, . . . conclusory statements, conjecture, or speculation by the party resisting the motion will not defeat summary judgment” | 9 |
| 4 | Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hodge | green | “statements without citation to evidence may be properly ignored by the court.” | 8 |
| 5 | New World Solutions, Inc. v. NameMedia Inc. | green | “f a party fails to properly support a statement by an adequate citation to the record, the court may properly disregard that assertion.” | 8 |
| 6 | Chandok v. Klessig | green | “where the undisputed facts reveal that there is an absence of sufficient proof as to one essential element of a claim, any factual disputes with respect to other elements become immaterial and cannot defeat a motion for summary judgment.” | 7 |
| 7 | Kaur v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corp. | green | “where there are no citations or where the cited materials do not support the factual assertions in the statements, the court is free to disregard the assertion.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.