Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 78 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rockville Cars, LLC v. City of Rockville.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rockville Cars, LLC v. City of Rockville Anchor | green | “must accept the factual allegations of the complaint as true and construe them in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” | 48 |
| 2 | Carolina Chloride, Inc. v. Richland County | green | “(1) a duty of care owed by the defendant to the plaintiff; (2) a breach of that duty by a negligent act or omission; and (3) damage proximately resulting from the breach.” | 17 |
| 3 | Madison Ex Rel. Bryant v. Babcock Center | green | “there is no general duty to control the conduct of another or to warn a third person or potential victim of danger.” | 13 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.